首页> 外文OA文献 >Raising rivals’ costs or improving efficiency? : an exploratory study of managers’ views on backward integration in the grocery market
【2h】

Raising rivals’ costs or improving efficiency? : an exploratory study of managers’ views on backward integration in the grocery market

机译:提高竞争对手的成本或提高效率? :对经理人对食品杂货市场后向整合的看法的探索性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Large retail grocery chains’ backward integration into distribution, procurement and production is controversial, and has received a lot of attention by both policymakers and market players. If a large retail chain for instance takes over scale intensive distribution activities from its suppliers, direct distribution from these suppliers to other retail chains might become more expensive (and might even initiate costly industry‐wide backward integration). An interesting question is thus whether large retailers undertake backward integration mainly for efficiency reasons or whether they do so in order to gain a competitive advantage through raising the costs of the smaller rivals. Theory and econometric analyses are inconclusive. The current study uses a survey to investigate managers’ views on this issue. The study is explorative, and thus does not formally test different theories, but our findings indicate that large retail chains’ incentives to backward integrate are mainly related to efficiency rationales.
机译:大型零售杂货连锁店向后整合到分销,采购和生产中一直是有争议的,并且受到政策制定者和市场参与者的广泛关注。例如,如果大型零售链从其供应商那里接手了规模较大的分销活动,那么从这些供应商到其他零售链的直接分销可能会变得更加昂贵(甚至可能会导致整个行业范围内向后整合的成本上升)。因此,一个有趣的问题是大型零售商是否主要是出于效率方面的考虑而进行后向整合,还是为了通过提高较小竞争对手的成本来获得竞争优势而这样做。理论和计量经济学分析尚无定论。当前的研究使用一项调查来调查管理人员对此问题的看法。该研究是探索性的,因此并未正式检验不同的理论,但我们的发现表明,大型零售连锁店向后整合的动机主要与效率原理有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号